Photogrammetry in the field : documenting, recording, and presenting archaeology
Part of : Mediterranean archaeology & archaeometry : international journal ; Vol.14, No.4, 2014, pages 101-108
Issue:
Pages:
101-108
Abstract:
The development of three-dimensional documentation technologies such as LiDAR and Structure from Motion (essentially digital photogrammetry) has led to a recording revolution, as these methods are increasingly applied to field archaeology. 3D methods have the potential to become an integral part of the archaeological toolkit, as they have the capability to produce spatially-referenced outputs, such as orthophotos and digital elevation models (DEMs), with greater efficiency than traditional methods. The combination of Structure from Motion and low-altitude aerial photography can facilitate the production of these GIS outputs, which can then be used for digitization or as basemaps. These methods allow for accurate and precise recording with a relative minimum of field time. As the existing body of 3D data increases in size, museums have the unique opportunity to be able to take advantage of these datasets to update their exhibits and display archaeological context and the process of excavation through visualizations of 3D models. The spread of 3D documentation and recording in archaeology may provide a unique opportunity for collaboration between these two professions, and allow for archaeology to improve its public outreach. The methodology presented here is based on field research in Jordan
Subject:
Keywords:
Cyber-archaeology, Photogrammetry, Low-altitude Aerial Photography, Jordan
Notes:
Corresponding author: Matthew D. Howland ([email protected])
References (1):
- Al-Kheder, S., Al-shawabke, Y., and Haala, N. (2009) Developing a documentation system for desert palaces in Jordan using 3D scanning and digital photogrammetry. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 36, 537–546.Bruno, F., Bruno, S., De Sensi, G., Luchi, M., Mancuso, S., and Muzzupappa, M. (2010) From 3d reconstruction to virtual reality: A complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 11, 42–49.Carrozzino, M., and Bergamasco, M. (2010) Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 11, 452–458.Lambers, K., Eisenbeiss, H., Sauerbier, M., Kupferschmidt, D., Gaisecker, T., Sotoodeh, S., and Hanusch, T. (2007) Combining photogrammetry and laser scanning for the recording and modeling of the Late Intermediate period site of Pinchango Alto, Palpa, Peru. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 34, 1702–1712.Lerma, J.L., Navarro, S., Cabrelles, M., and Villaverde, V. (2010) Terrestrial laser scanning and close range photogrammetry for 3D archaeological documentation: the Upper Palaeolithic Cave of Parpallo´ as a case study. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 37, 499–507.Levy TE. 2013. Cyber-Archaeology and World Cultural Heritage: Insights from the Holy Land. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences LXVI:26-33.Lo, C.P. (1973) The Use of Orthophotographs in Urban Planning. The Town Planning Review, vol. 44, 71–87.Louhaichi, M., Borman, M.M., Johnson, A.L., and Johnson, D.E. (2003) Creating low-cost high-resolution digital elevation models. Journal of Range Management, vol. 56, 92–96.Ortiz Sanz, J., de la Luz Gil Docampo, M., Martinez Rodriguez, S., Terese Rergo Sanmartin, M., and Mejide Cameselle, G. (2010) A simple methodology for recording petroglyphs using low-cost digital image correlation photogrammetry and consumer-grade digital cameras. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 37, 3158–3169.Olson, B.R., Placchetti, R., Quartermaine, J., and Killebrew, A.E. (2013) The Tel Akko Total Archaeology Project (Akko, Israel): Assessing the suitability of multi-scale 3D field recording in archaeology. Journal of Field Archaeology, vol. 38, 244–262.Pavlidis, G., Koutsoudis, A., Arnaoutoglou, F., Tsioukas, V., and Chamzas, C. (2007) Methods for 3D digitization of Cultural Heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 8, 93–98.Pearce, S.M. (1993) Museums, Objects, and Collections Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Institution Press.Salamon A, Ward S, McCoy F, Hall J, and Levy TE. in press. Inspired by a Tsunami? Earth Sciences Perspectives of the Exodus Narrative. In: Levy TE, Schneider T, and Propp WHC, editors. Israel's Exodus in Transdisciplinary Perspective - Text, Archaeology, Culture and Geoscience. New York: Springer.Sylaiou, S., Liarokapis, F., Kotsakis, K., and Patias, P. (2009) Virtual Museums, a Survey and Some Issues for Consideration. Journal of Cultural Heritage vol. 10, 520–528.Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P.F., Hartley, R.I., and Fitzgibbon, A.W. (2000) Bundle adjustment – A modern synthesis. In Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Verhoeven, G. (2011) Taking computer vision aloft – Archaeological three-dimensional reconstructions from aerial photographs with PhotoScan. Archaeological Prospection, vol. 18, 67–73.Verhoeven, G., Doneus, M., Briese, Ch., and Vermeulen, F. (2012) Mapping by matching: a computer vision-based approach to fast and accurate georeferencing of archaeological aerial photographs. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 39, 2060–2070.Wachowiak, M.J., and Karas, B.V. (2009) 3D scanning and replication for museum and cultural heritage applications. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, vol. 48, 141–158.Wheeler, M. (1954) Archaeology From the Earth Oxford, Clarendon Press.Yilmaz, H.M., Yakar, M., Gulec, S.A., and Dulgerler, O.N. (2007) Importance of digital close-range photogrammetry in documentation of cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 8, 428–433.
